Vibe coding · Cursor · Claude Code · AI workflows

Vibe coding setup audits for Cursor, Claude Code, and AI-assisted teams

I audit how your team uses AI coding tools today — rules, context, MCP servers, review habits, and guardrails — so you get speed without shipping fragile code or leaking secrets.

Laptop with code editor on a desk
Photo: Pexels

Overview

Teams adopt Cursor or Claude Code quickly, then hit uneven results: some engineers 3x output, others fight hallucinations, and nobody agrees on when AI-generated code is “done.”

I audit your vibe coding setup end to end — editor config, project rules, context strategy, MCP integrations, PR review norms, and how AI fits your stack and compliance needs.

You leave with a tailored playbook: what to automate, what still needs human judgment, and how to measure whether AI is actually helping velocity and quality.

At a glance

Tools covered

Cursor · Claude Code

Plus Copilot, Windsurf, and custom MCP

Team size

1–50 engineers

Startups through scale-up eng orgs

Format

Remote

Workshops and async repo review

What you get

Tooling and config review

Cursor rules, Claude Code settings, ignored paths, model choices, and cost controls.

Context and prompt strategy

How your repo is indexed, what docs agents see, and patterns that reduce wrong assumptions.

Workflow and review guardrails

When to use agent mode vs inline, test expectations, and security boundaries.

Team enablement plan

Training outline, champions model, and metrics to track adoption health.

AI coding maturity gaps teams usually have

Frequency of issues found during vibe coding setup audits.

How it works

Session 1Current state — How each role uses AI today and what breaks.
Session 2Config deep dive — Rules, MCP, secrets handling, and repo layout.
Session 3Playbook draft — Recommended defaults and team standards.
Follow-upOffice hours — Optional check-in after two weeks of adoption.

Outcomes teams care about

  • Consistent AI output quality across the team
  • Faster onboarding for new hires using your stack
  • Clear guardrails leadership can trust
  • Less time fighting the tool, more time shipping

Frequently asked questions

Is this only for Cursor?

Cursor and Claude Code are the focus, but I also cover Copilot, Windsurf, and custom MCP setups your team already uses.

Do you help write .cursor/rules or CLAUDE.md?

Yes. The audit includes recommended rules tailored to your stack, conventions, and compliance needs.

What about non-engineers using AI?

See the separate AI tools for work offering. This audit is optimized for software teams shipping production code.

Can you train the team afterward?

Yes. Workshops and ongoing vibe coding coaching are available — see vibe-coding-training-for-teams on this site.

Want vibe coding that actually sticks?

Tell me your stack, team size, and which AI tools you use today. I will propose an audit and enablement plan.