Stack experience
Angular · Vue · React
Plus TypeScript, SSR, and design tokens
Frontend · Angular · React · Vue · Performance
I review your frontend like a lead engineer preparing for a rebrand, merger, or platform expansion — architecture, performance, accessibility, design system health, and delivery bottlenecks.

Frontend debt shows up as slow PR cycles, inconsistent UI, rising bug counts, and engineers avoiding certain folders. Left alone, it becomes a full rewrite proposal.
I audit frontends with production experience from Printify’s merchant platform rebrand, industrial SaaS at Fream, and years of design-system leadership — so recommendations are practical, not theoretical.
You get findings your team can action: bundle and runtime performance, component boundaries, testing strategy, accessibility gaps, and a migration path that does not freeze feature work.
Stack experience
Angular · Vue · React
Plus TypeScript, SSR, and design tokens
Audit depth
Repo + UX
Code sampling plus user-facing review
Delivery
1–2 weeks
Depends on monorepo size and access
Coupling, shared state, API layers, and where features should live as the team grows.
Bundle size, lazy loading, rendering hotspots, and Core Web Vitals risks on key routes.
Token usage, component duplication, and drift between Figma and shipped UI.
Linting, testing pyramid, visual regression, and PR review patterns that stick.
Typical distribution of high-severity findings in mature SaaS frontends.
Primarily Angular, Vue, and React with TypeScript. I also review SSR setups, micro-frontends, and shared design-token pipelines.
Yes. Interviews with leads and ICs are part of understanding real bottlenecks, not just static analysis.
Automated scans supplement manual review. Judgment about trade-offs and team capacity comes from experience shipping at scale.
Yes — staff engineer engagements, design system builds, and performance sprints are common follow-ons.
Share your stack, repo size, and what is slowing the team. I will propose audit scope and availability.